An Angry Woman
June 14, 2008 by OT HillI’m sure this has been around the net a couple of times, but this email by an angry woman speaks from the heart of many, many Americans:
I’m sure this has been around the net a couple of times, but this email by an angry woman speaks from the heart of many, many Americans:
Glenn Beck has the response that oil corporations should give to Congress:
…. the high price of gasoline. How could it have possibly gotten this high?
Let me tell you what we’ve done here in congress. We told you that drilling in ANWR is off limits. We told you that drilling off the coast of Florida and California is off limits. We told you, Mr. Big oil, that there wouldn’t be any new leases for drilling in the Gulf while China and Venezuela and even Cuba pursued these leases and have just signed 100-year leases on the oil in the Gulf of Mexico. We here in congress have promised, as all three presidential candidates have also promised, to introduce and pass in the next term a cap and trade legislation bill that will increase the price of gasoline according to the EPA by an additional $1.50. Some people say it could be as high as $5 additional per gallon. Order, order. We have said that we’re shutting down oil fields in Colorado. We won’t let you develop shale oil fields in several Western states. And yesterday we passed legislation that would let us sue OPEC with the full understanding that they’ll never retaliate. Yes. We have allowed environmental attorneys to sue you big oil fiends for future possible destruction of Alaskan Eskimo village which legal experts believe is the same strategy used to bring down big tobacco. We’re especially proud of our recent action to protect the polar bear and their habitat which just happens to be where the future oil deposits happen to be located. We told you that you’re making too much money and that we’re looking at seizing any money that we consider windfall profits. Yes. We have allowed you to drill in some very small areas in Alaska while simultaneously creating very generous environmental laws which have tied up the very production we authorize through years of litigation after you spent the money on buying and setting up equipment. We told you through our policies that we would not allow you to build a new refinery in over 30 years. In fact, this great country, under our tutelage, has even reduced the number of operational refineries by half since 1982. Order, order, order. We have even told your potential competitors in the nuclear and hydroelectric industries that we would send the environmental lawyers after them if they even dared think about building a new plant or a new dam. We’ve refused to fund or allow the deployment of coal-to-oil technology which has been around since the 1930s. We’ve told you that you have to make different blends of gasoline, let states like California dictate what unique gasoline blends you have to make for them. We will not reduce our federal gasoline tax. We won’t even consider reducing it for the summer …..
And Congress blames the oil corporations for the high cost of oil????
Retirement is wonderful …. health is back on schedule …. flowers planted …. majority of boxes are unpacked …. voted early. Life is good.
I still rise at 6 am, but the first thoughts that flow through my mind have to do with the health of the 16-year-old dog that sleeps on the rug beside me. She’s managing — only her arthritis and waning eyesight betray her still seemingly spry demeanor — and her daily mission is to stay near as I busy myself with morning chores. We walk regularly. Not as far or as quickly as in the past, but often with her leaning against my knee. I’ve learned to watch for signs of her well-being. I want her to experience no pain (routine discomfort is part of the aging process for all of us). Thus far, she’s doing amazingly well for a 50 pound wonder-dog who once entertained the elderly …. I will stand by her side to guide and support her as long as I am needed. After all — I would have been shredded by a grizzly bear or battered by burglers many years ago had she not stood by my side. What goes around, comes around. She has been a wonderful friend and companion throughout the years. Our ashes will someday be scattered together …. And I anticipate frolicking with her at the Rainbow Bridge and singing our favorite songs again.
To those who know the unconditional love and devotion of a beloved dog and the bond that exists – you understand, I’m certain. More at The Chocolate Chronicles.
PowerLineBlog surmises the fate of John McCain, Mitt Romney and political protocol in the Republican Party:
As the number two contender in 2000, McCain was the heir apparent; hence his early front-runner status. His resurgence in recent months stems from a number of factors, including his own unique stature and history, public awareness of success in Iraq, Rudy Giuliani’s decision to forgo the early primaries, and more. But the biggest factor of all may have been the reassertion of what, in Republican politics, amounts almost to the law of gravity: McCain’s status as the next candidate in line.
This Republican tendency can be frustrating, but it does spare us from embarrassments like Jimmy Carter and Michael Dukakis. For what it’s worth, if McCain gets the nomination this year and loses, in 2012 Mitt Romney will be the presumed candidate, assuming that he keeps himself busy with party activities over the next few years. Romney is relatively young and in excellent health; 2008 could turn out to be a tune-up for him, somewhat as 1976 was for Ronald Reagan.
I disagree. Placing political protocol above the needs of this nation is a course toward disaster. Our nation needs new and vibrant leadership to carry us forward into the 21st century — into a world that no long fits the mold of either political protocol, the 19th or 2oth centuries.
If John McCain becomes the Republican nominee, America will see not only the demise of the Republican party, but of our nation’s role as a global leader. The greatest loss will be that one person — Mitt Romney — could have made all the difference.
And we have four days to ensure that Republican protocol is not the best option.
More at Perish the Thought and Elderscapes.
No longer the “Grand Old Party,” the GOP has now deserted its heritage to become the Guardians of Palimony.
Palimony: Making payment to someone to whom you have no legal affiliation.
Example: Republican party leaders endorsing John McCain — for whom there is no evidence that he IS a Republican.
Here’s McCain: Biting the (free market) hand that feeds you …. flaunting “bipartisanship” as a means of achieving less-than-conservative goals …. a “slash-and-burn” mentality to confront those who dare to think differently or challenge him …. declaring his lack of support for Judge Alito … resorting to “old Washington” political lies and attacks to “win” his point ….
For all that ails our nation, I see John McCain as part of the problem. IMO — he will never rally the core-constituents needed to prevent Bill Clinton’s 3rd and 4th terms. Never. No matter how many of the old guard rally around him. Never.
The GOP; the Grand Old Party; the Guardians of Palimony.
John McCain as a patriot? Pfffffth. The man is a survivor. Nothing more. Nothing less.
I have this eerie, sickening feeling that GOP party bosses have already decided that John McCain’s longevity has somehow “earned” him the nominee mantle.
To think that the future of our party and the fate of this nation are to be represented by a cantankerous, mean-spirited old man whose cancer-bloated skin cannot hide the malice that eats from within ….
I will continue to support Mitt Romney. If my fellow-conservatives truly care about the future of this nation — so will they.
And that — if McCain is our party nominee — is my concession speech to the Republican Party.
Just what this country needs —- a leader to take us through the darkness who doesn’t know the difference between “sunlight” and “sunshine” ……
There’s a reason some of John McCain’s conservative supporters avoid discussing his record. They want to talk about his personal story, his position on the surge, his supposed electability. But whenever the rest of his career comes up, the knee-jerk reply is to characterize the inquiries as attacks.
The McCain domestic record is a disaster. To say he fought spending, most particularly earmarks, is to nibble around the edges and miss the heart of the matter. For starters, consider …….
The article is a must-read.
As are these ….
Main stream media is becoming more overt in suggesting how and what they want conservatives voters to think …. Their message is either direct or by slant or by subtle undertone. It’s as if they really believe that conservatives are either “hicks, hayseeds or rednecks.” Oh, yeah — and religious fanatics.
The media alternately portrays the race for the Republican ticket as either a crusade — a battle of the Christian right against the less-than-right Christians/non-Christians — or as a subtle display of their own religious bigotry and hypocrisy.
They mock Mike Huckabee and his double-wide (pun), double-standards.
[But then, anyone to the left of Chuck Norris mocks the Huckster.]
They subliminally tell us that Romney’s wealth and success as a governor and entrepreneur are directly related to his Mormonism. (Which, according to Mike Huckabee and other bigots, is a cult.)
They promote candidates who share their views and either ignore or ridicule those who don’t. Examples: McCain on his Immigration policy, Hillary on her claims of experience, Obama on the meaning of the title of his book.
Hicks, hayseeds and rednecks. And religious fanatics.
Brings to mind Thomas Sowell’s Random Thoughts:
I can’t get as fiercely involved as some other people do in controversies about the origins of human life on earth. I wasn’t there.
One of the painful signs of years of dumbed-down education is how many people are unable to make a coherent argument. They can vent their emotions, question other people’s motives, make bold assertions, repeat slogans— anything except reason.
Barack Obama is the newest face on the political scene, expressing some of the oldest notions. Virtually everything he says is vintage 1960s rhetoric, as if he has learned nothing from the many disasters that 1960s notions have led to in the decades since then.
People who lament the small percentages of women in some high-end jobs seem unaware that top jobs often involve 70 or 80 hours of work per week. A mother may work that many hours at home taking care of a family, without adding the same number of hours at the office.
A recent study showed the median income of major corporate CEOs to be about $8 million a year. That’s less than a third of what Alex Rodriguez earns and less than one-thirtieth of what Oprah Winfrey makes. But no one is denouncing them for “greed.”
It is amazing how many people who want us to get out of Iraq want us to go into Darfur.
A joke says that a poll was taken in California, asking if people thought illegal immigration was a serious problem. The results showed that 29 percent said, “Yes, there is a serious problem.” But 71 percent said, “No es una problema seriosa.”
People who refuse to face the reality of hard choices are forever coming up with some clever “third way”— often leading to worse disasters than either of the hard choices.
Sometimes it looks as if the Democrats are out to win at all costs, while the Republicans are out to compromise at all costs.
Although I am ready to defend what I have said, many people expect me to defend what others have attributed to me.A reader says that Connecticut’s “Three Strikes” law is so weak that it is more like “30 strikes and we’ll think about it while you strike again.”
Wise people created civilization over the centuries and clever people are dismantling it today. You can see it happening just by channel surfing on TV or hear it in rap music or read it in the pompous nonsense of academics and judges.
Tennis star James Blake never seems to be relaxed during a match. Maybe he would be ranked even higher if he could relax. Most sports require some combination of concentration and relaxation— and too much of either is a big handicap.
Many on the political left are so entranced by the beauty of their vision that they cannot see the ugly reality they are creating in the real world.
With all the old movie favorites being shown again and again on television, it is remarkable that the old movie classic “Alfie” is seldom shown. Could it be fear that the scene where cold-blooded Alfie breaks down and cries at the sight of an aborted baby is something that would unleash the furies of the feminazis?
It is amazing how many people see no problem with having pay levels determined according to what third parties would like to see, instead of according to supply and demand.
One of the great non sequiturs of the left is that, if the free market doesn’t work perfectly, then it doesn’t work at all— and the government should step in.
Despite people who speak glibly of “earlier and simpler times,” all that makes earlier times seem simpler is our ignorance of their complexities.
We all believe that people are innocent until proven guilty. Some on the left believe that they are innocent even after being proven guilty.
Chutzpah department: When disbarred former D.A. Michael Nifong mailed his Bar card back to his state Bar Association, he included a note decrying “the fundamental unfairness” with which the Bar had treated him. This from a man who was ready to ruin three lives and polarize a community, in order to win an election.
“Fundamental fairness?” Nifong was a democrat, wasn’t he? And defended by the main stream media, as I recall ….
Why not?
McCain expected Congress to fall in line behind his Immigration Reform package without having seen or read it.
But he won’t comment on the President’s tax stimulus package for the same reason?
“I have to see it. I can’t tell you I’d vote for or against something that I haven’t seen.”
There is little wonder McPain can’t garner the confidence of conservative voters.
You can’t have it both ways, Johnny.
More on Michigan’s unemployment issues and the economy at Perish the Thought.